Objective Various motion correction (MC) algorithms for positron emission tomography
(PET) have been proposed to accelerate the diagnostic performance and research in brain …

Head motion is difficult to avoid in long PET studies, degrading the image quality and
offsetting the benefit of using a high-resolution scanner. As a potential solution in an …

Purposes Subject's motion during brain PET scan degrades spatial resolution and
quantification of PET images. To suppress these effects, rigid-body motion correction …

Motion of the head during brain positron emission tomography (PET) acquisitions has been
identified as a source of artifact in the reconstructed image. A number of techniques have …

98 Objectives: Existing brain PET motion correction (MC) methods include frame-based
image-registration (FIR) and correction using real-time hardware-based motion tracking …

Aim The motion of the head during brain positron emission tomography (PET) acquisitions
has been identified as a source of artifact in the reconstructed image. In this study, a method …

Head movements during brain imaging using high resolution positron emission tomography
(PET) impair the image quality which, along with the improvement of the spatial resolution of …

Since recent Positron Emission Tomography (PET) scanner has a high spatial resolution,
head motion during brain PET study could cause motion artifact on the image, which might …

Marker-less head motion correction methods have been well-studied; however, no reports
discussing potential issues in positional calibration between a PET system and an external …

As a non-invasive imaging tool, positron emission tomography (PET) plays an important role
in brain science and disease research. Dynamic acquisition is one way of brain PET …