GRADE Evidence to Decision (EtD) frameworks: a systematic and transparent approach to making well informed healthcare choices. 1: Introduction

P Alonso-Coello, HJ Schünemann, J Moberg… - bmj, 2016 - bmj.com
Healthcare decision making is complex. Decision-making processes and the factors
(criteria) that decision makers should consider vary for different types of decisions, including …

[HTML][HTML] Priority setting for universal health coverage: we need evidence-informed deliberative processes, not just more evidence on cost-effectiveness

R Baltussen, MP Jansen, E Mikkelsen… - … journal of health …, 2016 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Priority setting of health interventions is generally considered as a valuable approach to
support low-and middle-income countries (LMICs) in their strive for universal health …

Stated and revealed preferences for funding new high-cost cancer drugs: a critical review of the evidence from patients, the public and payers

TE MacLeod, AH Harris, A Mahal - The Patient-Patient-Centered …, 2016 - Springer
Background The growing focus on patient-centred care has encouraged the inclusion of
patient and public input into payer drug reimbursement decisions. Yet, little is known about …

[HTML][HTML] The health systems' priority setting criteria for selecting health technologies: A systematic review of the current evidence

M Mobinizadeh, P Raeissi, AA Nasiripour… - Medical journal of the …, 2016 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background: In the recent years, using health technologies to diagnose and treat diseases
has had a considerable and accelerated growth. The proper use of these technologies may …

[HTML][HTML] Can the EVIDEM framework tackle issues raised by evaluating treatments for rare diseases: analysis of issues and policies, and context-specific adaptation

M Wagner, H Khoury, J Willet, D Rindress… - …, 2016 - Springer
Background The multiplicity of issues, including uncertainty and ethical dilemmas, and
policies involved in appraising interventions for rare diseases suggests that multicriteria …

[HTML][HTML] Combining multi-criteria decision analysis and mini-health technology assessment: A funding decision-support tool for medical devices in a university hospital …

N Martelli, P Hansen, H Van Den Brink… - Journal of biomedical …, 2016 - Elsevier
Background At the hospital level, decisions about purchasing new and oftentimes expensive
medical devices must take into account multiple criteria simultaneously. Multi-criteria …

[HTML][HTML] Exploring the effectiveness, efficiency and equity (3e's) of research and research impact assessment

S Hinrichs-Krapels, J Grant - Palgrave communications, 2016 - nature.com
The allocation of research funding can benefit greatly from robust analysis of what has
worked in research. In turn, these analyses can help advocacy initiatives and demonstrate …

[HTML][HTML] Patient and interest organizations' views on personalized medicine: a qualitative study

I Budin-Ljøsne, JR Harris - BMC Medical Ethics, 2016 - Springer
Background Personalized medicine (PM) aims to tailor disease prevention, diagnosis, and
treatment to individuals on the basis of their genes, lifestyle and environments. Patient and …

Testing multi-criteria decision analysis for more transparent resource-allocation decision making in Colombia

HEC Jaramillo, M Goetghebeur… - International journal of …, 2016 - cambridge.org
Objectives: In 2012, Colombia experienced an important institutional transformation after the
establishment of the Health Technology Assessment Institute (IETS), the disbandment of the …

Identifying and revealing the importance of decision-making criteria for health technology assessment: a retrospective analysis of reimbursement recommendations in …

S Schmitz, L McCullagh, R Adams, M Barry… - Pharmacoeconomics, 2016 - Springer
Background Decisions on reimbursement of health interventions in many jurisdictions are
informed by health technology assessments (HTAs). Historically, the focus of these has often …