Objectives To address the following question:“Is the timing of implant placement and/or
loading influencing the esthetic outcomes of implant‐supported single crowns?” Material …

Immediate implants present a high risk of early failure. To avoid this, preventive antibiotics
(PAs) are prescribed; however, their inappropriate administration leads to antimicrobial …

Objectives To compare the 1‐year aesthetic results of flapless single implants, placed in
fresh extraction sockets with bone replacement and immediate provisional restoration with …

Background Nowadays, due to the esthetic and social demands of patients, conventional
staged protocols seem to be increasingly replaced by faster, one-step protocols. The …

Background Understanding the anatomy of the facial alveolar bone (FAB), provides a
prognostic tool for estimating the degree of dimensional ridge alterations after tooth …

Aim The aim of this systematic review was to evaluate the efficacy of immediate implant
placement (IIP) compared to implants placed after alveolar ridge preservation (ARP) in terms …

The present review aimed to evaluate the difference of dental implant failure rates and
marginal bone loss (MBL) between implants inserted in fresh extraction sockets or healed …

Objectives To assess the outcomes of soft tissue augmentation, in terms of change in level
and thickness of mid‐buccal mucosa, at implants sites in the zone of the aesthetic priority …

Abstract Objectives Comparing PES/WES scores, modified success rate, survival, success,
buccal bone thickness and patient‐reported outcomes of immediate dental implants placed …

Immediate implant placement (IIP) in fresh extraction sockets exhibits similar survival and
success rates to delayed implant placement in healed sockets. Several advantages of IIP …