Adequate and transparent reporting is necessary for critically appraising published
research. Yet, ample evidence suggests that the design, conduct, analysis, interpretation …

Risk of bias can contribute to irreproducible science and mislead decision making. Analyses
of smaller subsections of the exercise science literature suggest many exercise science …

Background Clinical guidelines rely on sound evidence to underpin recommendations for
patient care. Compromised research integrity can erode public trust and the credibility of the …

Objectives To describe, and explain the rationale for, the methods used and decisions made
during development of the updated SPIRIT 2024 and CONSORT 2024 reporting guidelines …

Objective Evaluate methodological quality of type 2 diabetes RCTs conducted in Iran and
cited in clinical practice guidelines and systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Methods We …

More than a decade after the Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials group released a
reporting items checklist for non-inferiority randomized controlled trials, the infectious …

This literature review examines all treatments for behavioral insomnia in children under 6
years of age to determine which treatments have empirically demonstrated efficacy …

Aim Heart failure (HF) is a major cause of morbidity and mortality in older adults.
Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) inform HF policy and practice, but the accurate …

Objectives This study evaluates the endorsement of open science practices by dental
journals. Materials and methods This was a meta-research study that included journals …

The nasal potential difference test (nPD) is an electrophysiological measurement which is
altered in patients and animal models with cystic fibrosis (CF). Because protocols and …