Building on developments in machine learning and prior work in the science of judicial
prediction, we construct a model designed to predict the behavior of the Supreme Court of …

Constitutional Law, Ninth Edition by Geoffrey R. Stone, Louis M. Seidman, Cass R. Sunstein,
Mark V. Tushnet, Pamela S. Karlan, Aziz Z. Huq, and Leah M. Litman guides students …

Although scholars increasingly acknowledge a contemporaneous relationship between
public opinion and Supreme Court decisions, debate continues as to why this relationship …

The US Supreme Court is a public policy battleground in which organized interests attempt
to etch their economic, legal, and political preferences into law through the filing of amicus …

In recent years, the United States Supreme Court has decided fewer cases than at any other
time in its recent history. Scholars and practitioners alike have criticized the drop in the …

Judicial scholars often struggle to disentangle the effects of law and policy preferences on
US Supreme Court decision making. We employ a new approach to measuring the effect—if …

In this Article, we present an exploratory empirical study of federal workplace racial
harassment cases that span a twenty-year period. Multiple analyses found that judges' race …

There is wide scholarly agreement that the frequent replacement of justices has kept the
Supreme Court generally attuned to public opinion. Recent research indicates that, in …

The article explores the use of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in arbitral or judicial decision-making
from a holistic point of view, exploring the technical aspects of AI, its practical limitations as …

It has become de rigueur for leading law schools to profess great enthusiasm for both
interdisciplinary and empirical research. Yet not all work in this vein has been warmly …