Ethical approval: None sought. How discourse analysts report ethical issues around publicly available online data

W Stommel, L Rijk - Research Ethics, 2021 - journals.sagepub.com
Although ethical guidelines for doing Internet research are available, most prominently those
of the Association of Internet Researchers (www. aoir. org), ethical decision-making for …

(Why) is misinformation a problem?

Z Adams, M Osman, C Bechlivanidis… - Perspectives on …, 2023 - journals.sagepub.com
In the last decade there has been a proliferation of research on misinformation. One
important aspect of this work that receives less attention than it should is exactly why …

[PDF][PDF] Precedence-setting tokens: Issues of classification and functional attribution.

EN Malyuga, AS Akopova - TLC Journal, 2021 - rudn.tlcjournal.org
The study identifies and classifies the criteria instrumented to categorise and analyse
precedence-setting tokens as units of sociocultural experience expressed in language and …

Before name-calling: Dynamics and triggers of ad hominem fallacies in web argumentation

I Habernal, H Wachsmuth, I Gurevych… - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2018 - arxiv.org
Arguing without committing a fallacy is one of the main requirements of an ideal debate. But
even when debating rules are strictly enforced and fallacious arguments punished, arguers …

Modeling financial analysts' decision making via the pragmatics and semantics of earnings calls

KA Keith, A Stent - arXiv preprint arXiv:1906.02868, 2019 - arxiv.org
Every fiscal quarter, companies hold earnings calls in which company executives respond to
questions from analysts. After these calls, analysts often change their price target …

Fixed that for you: Generating contrastive claims with semantic edits

C Hidey, K McKeown - Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North …, 2019 - osti.gov
Understanding contrastive opinions is a key component of argument generation. Central to
an argument is the claim, a statement that is in dispute. Generating a counter-argument then …

Detecting attackable sentences in arguments

Y Jo, S Bang, E Manzoor, E Hovy, C Reed - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2020 - arxiv.org
Finding attackable sentences in an argument is the first step toward successful refutation in
argumentation. We present a first large-scale analysis of sentence attackability in online …

Seamlessly integrating factual information and social content with persuasive dialogue

M Chen, W Shi, F Yan, R Hou, J Zhang… - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2022 - arxiv.org
Complex conversation settings such as persuasion involve communicating changes in
attitude or behavior, so users' perspectives need to be addressed, even when not directly …

ENTRUST: Argument reframing with language models and entailment

T Chakrabarty, C Hidey, S Muresan - arXiv preprint arXiv:2103.06758, 2021 - arxiv.org
Framing involves the positive or negative presentation of an argument or issue depending
on the audience and goal of the speaker (Entman 1983). Differences in lexical framing, the …

On the Relation between Opinion Change and Information Consumption on Reddit

F Petruzzellis, F Bonchi, GDF Morales… - Proceedings of the …, 2023 - ojs.aaai.org
While much attention has been devoted to the causes of opinion change, little is known
about its consequences. Our study moves a first step in this direction by looking at Reddit …