Background: This meta-analysis aimed to explore the overall effect and safety of anterior
laparoscopic surgery versus conventional open surgery for patients with colorectal cancer …

Aim: This meta-analysis aims to compare hand-assisted laparoscopic surgery (HALS) and
conventional open surgery (OS) for colorectal cancer (CRC) in terms of intraoperative and …

Aim: This meta-analysis aims at comparing laparoscopic intersphincteric resection (LISR)
with conventional open ISR (OISR) for low rectal cancer (LRC) in terms of intraoperative …

Objective The aim of this study was to express the effects of demographic characteristics, the
type of the surgery, tumour characteristics and adjuvant therapy on urinary and sexual …

This meta‐analysis was conducted to evaluate the effect of microinvasive and open
operations on postoperative wound complications in low rectal carcinoma patients …

Introduction Laparoscopy in T4 colon cancers is not widely advocated due to concerns
regarding safety and oncologic efficacy. We conducted this study to compare the short-and …

Patients experience significant postoperative pain after laparoscopic resection of colorectal
cancer. Transversus abdominis plane block (TAPB) provides effective analgesia, and recent …

Objective: The aim of this article is to compare the oncological outcomes of laparoscopic and
open resection for colon cancer. Method: Search the publications on comparison the efficacy …

INTRODUCTION: The improvement of surgical procedures and oncological outcomes in the
treatment of low-ultralow rectal cancer, made important the evaluation of functional results …

Purpose In spite of the unique advantages of minimally invasive treatment, laparoscopic
surgery is not recommended in T4 colon cancer patients with the concern of technical …