When judging the morality of an action, individuals may exhibit a bias stemming from group
favoritism. It leads to the expression of different moral evaluations of the same behaviors …

Se presenta un estudio sobre los factores sociodemográficos, ideológicos y partidistas que
predicen la opinión de la ciudadanía sobre el control gubernamental de la información en …

Judges are human beings. Is their behavior therefore subject to the same effects that
psychology and behavioral economics have documented for convenience samples, like …

Judicial decision-making has attracted a lot of interest in the experimental community. Over
decades, a rich literature has emerged. It has investigated to what degree judicial decision …

Modern liberal democracy is characterized by multiple trends affecting the dynamics of the
lawmaking process. Interpretation frequently affects the content of the legal rule, sometimes …

Proportionality analysis (PA), which is widely used by courts around the globe to balance
conflicting public goals or private rights, is typically considered to be a rational process. But …

This chapter highlights comparative research that implicates the ability of judges to make
decisions that are fair, accurate, and that adequately account for various influences in their …

The thesis brings the freejon approach to light, explains the dynamic features of it, and
explores the prospects of freejon as an alternative approach to the burdensome and …

The book brings the freejon approach to light, explains its dynamic features, and explores
the prospects of freejon as an alternative approach to the burdensome and troublesome …

Empirical legal studies are often challenged by traditional doctrinal legal scholars as
irrelevant to normative legal reasoning. This article explores, through the lens of …