Scholarly communication is in a perpetual state of disruption. Within this, peer review of
research articles remains an essential part of the formal publication process, distinguishing it …

The gold standard of safe-guarding the quality of published science is peer review.
However, this long-standing system has not evolved in today's digital world, where there has …

Delays in peer reviewed publication may have consequences for both assessment of
scientific prowess in academia as well as communication of important information to the …

What are the challenges and opportunities facing peer review in a networked world? We
review the state of journal peer review at the end of 2010, beset by ever-increasing volumes …

Peer review is the gold standard for scientific communication, but its ability to guarantee the
quality of published research remains difficult to verify. Recent modeling studies suggest that …

University faculties generate a large amount of heterogeneous data in e-learning
environments that online systems and toolkits have made widely available in all aspects of …

Background It is commonly reported by editors that it has become harder to recruit reviewers
for peer review and that this is because individuals are being asked to review too often and …

Purpose The purpose of this paper is to better understand the theory and practice of peer
review in open-access mega-journals (OAMJs). OAMJs typically operate a “soundness-only” …

In this paper, we propose a novel framework for a scholarly journal–a token‐curated registry
(TCR). This model originates in the field of blockchain and cryptoeconomics and is …

This reprinted article originally appeared in Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the
Arts, 2014 (Feb), Vol 8 (1), 2-7.(The following abstract of the original article appeared in …