There is much disagreement about the claim that impurity constitutes a moral domain. We
propose a set of minimal criteria that could help re-orient the field to a direction of consensus …

Aesthetic and moral evaluations engage appetitive and defensive emotions. While the role
played by pleasure in positive aesthetic and moral judgements has been extensively …

The status of disgust as a sociomoral emotion is debated. We conducted a stringent test of
whether social stimuli (specifically, political outgroup members) can elicit physical disgust …

Through the evolutionary process of preadaptation, disgust was coopted to serve as the
guardian not just of one's body but also of one's soul—or so it has been theorized. On this …

People often appear to conflate anger and disgust, seemingly using expressions of both
emotions interchangeably in response to moral violations. Yet, anger and moral disgust …

Despite the growing interest on how Tourette syndrome (TS) affects social cognition skills,
this field remains to date relatively under‐explored. Here, we aim to advance knowledge on …

The same moral violation can give rise to different emotional and behavioral responses in
different individuals. The mechanisms that give rise to such differences–and the functions …

Emotivism in moral psychology holds that making moral judgements is at least partly an
affective process. Three emotivist hypotheses can be distinguished: the elicitation …

The CAD hypothesis holds that there is mapping between the three moral emotions
(contempt, anger and disgust) and the three moral codes of community, autonomy and …

Expressions of moral disgust and anger in social situations signal the target's moral failure to
third-party observers. But little is known about whether the two emotions have different …