Tactile or visual?: Stimulus characteristics determine receptive field type in a self-organizing map model of cortical development
Tactile receptive fields (RFs) are similar to visual receptive fields, while there is a subtle
difference. Our previous work showed that tactile RFs have advantage in texture boundary …
difference. Our previous work showed that tactile RFs have advantage in texture boundary …
Self-organization of tactile receptive fields: Exploring their textural origin and their representational properties
In our earlier work, we found that feature space induced by tactile receptive fields (TRFs) are
better than that by visual receptive fields (VRFs) in texture boundary detection tasks. This …
better than that by visual receptive fields (VRFs) in texture boundary detection tasks. This …
[图书][B] Performance, development, and analysis of tactile vs. visual receptive fields in texture tasks
CS Park - 2009 - search.proquest.com
Texture segmentation is an effortless process in scene analysis, yet its neural mechanisms
are not sufficiently understood. A common assumption in most current approaches is that …
are not sufficiently understood. A common assumption in most current approaches is that …
Figuring Time by Space: Representing sensory motion in cortical maps
S Wilson - 2011 - etheses.whiterose.ac.uk
How does the brain represent sensory input? When stimuli move across sensor surfaces,
such as a light source moving across the retina, sound moving between the ears, or contact …
such as a light source moving across the retina, sound moving between the ears, or contact …
Learning cortical representations from multiple whisker inputs
Rats' whiskers convey tactile information to the somatosensory cortex, where layer 4
neurons are clustered into barrels, each responding primarily to input from one principal …
neurons are clustered into barrels, each responding primarily to input from one principal …