In this note, I argue that McCain and Moretti's account of non-inferential justification is
subject to the subjective point of view objection, and that for this reason, it does not provide …

In previous work, I have suggested a doxastic account of perceptual experience according to
which experiences form a (peculiar) kind of belief: Beliefs with what I have called …

A prominent argument for internalism appeals to the requirement that justified beliefs not be
accidentally true from the subject's perspective. Bergmann's dilemma remains the most …

This paper criticizes phenomenal conservatism—the view according to which a subject S's
seeming that P provides S with defeasible justification for believing P. It argues that …

Epistemic internalists and externalists disagree deeply about the fundamental nature of
epistemic properties like epistemic justification. This chapter surveys general issues in the …

Justified beliefs must bear some connection to truth precisely because they are justified. This
poses a challenge to phenomenal conservatism, as there is reason to worry that seemings …

The epistemology of religious experience has been dominated for half a century by what I
call narrow approaches, ie, models that assume (1) religious experience consists …

This research aims to analyse and investigate the character and philosophical strength of
epistemological scepticism and whether contemporary anti-sceptical stances can …

이 논문의 목적은 악의 문제에 관한 전통적인 신정론의 논변에 대항해서 새롭게 제시되었던
로우의 무신론적 논변과 이를 비판한 회의적 유신론의 논변을 비교한 후, 이 논쟁에 현상적 …

휴머가 직접적 실재론에 근거해서 구축한 현상적 보수주의가 기존의 내재주의 이론들에 대한
대안으로서 입지를 확보할 수 있느냐는 문제에 대해 버그만은 부정적인 논거를 제시했다. 이 …