Collective decision-making is ubiquitous, and majority-voting and the Condorcet Jury
Theorem pervade thinking about collective decision-making. Thus, it is typically assumed …

This paper characterizes a unique mixed strategy Nash equilibrium in a one-dimensional
Downsian model of two-candidate elections with a continuous policy space, where …

This paper explores the role that difference plays in collective decision-making using the
Condorcet jury theorem. Agents facing a dichotomous decision might prove biased toward …

There is a gap in portfolio frameworks in regard to resource sharing between chosen
projects. This article describes a model that aims to fill this gap, enabling resource sharing …

The majority rule has caught much attention in recent debate about the aggregation of
judgments. But its role in finding the truth is limited. A majority of expert judgments is not …

Majority-voting and the Condorcet Jury Theorem pervade thinking about collective decision-
making. Thus, it is typically assumed that majority-voting is the best possible decision …

The aim of this note is to revisit the meaningfulness of the Condorcet Jury Theorem (CJT)
and apply it to the recent debate on liberal paternalism and consumer protection. The CJT …

The literature on information-aggregation based on the Condorcet Jury Theorem focuses on
binary choices. By applying well-known statistical methods to this issue, we develop a …

This paper studies unidimensional electoral competition between two office-motivated
candidates, where one of them enjoys a probabilistic and non-policy advantage over the …

This work proposes and studies a two candidate model of electoral competition with
candidate quality and media. The role of media is to inform voters about the quality of each …