It is nearly ubiquitous for philosophers interested in meaning and consequence to first
provide a semantics for sentences and next define what it means for sentences to follow …

Call public experts those experts who offer their expertise to benefit the general public.
Clearly not all experts are public experts. Some expertise is only relevant to a very narrow …

This book addresses two questions that are highly relevant for epistemology and for society:
What is ignorance and how should we rationally deal with it? It proposes a new way of …

Explanatory Optimism about the Hard Problem of Consciousness argues that despite the
worries of explanatory pessimists, consciousness can be fully explained in “easy” scientific …

I will present a novel argument that there can be epistemically vicious knowledge. In the kind
of case that interests me, the subject knows not despite but rather because of her vice. It is …

Here I will develop a naturalistic account of epistemic reflection and its significance for
epistemology. I will first argue that thought, as opposed to mere information processing …

Soundness Arguments for the consistency of a (mathematical) theory S aim to show that S is
consistent by first showing or employing the fact that S is sound, ie, that all theorems of S are …

Metaethical debunking arguments often conclude that no moral belief is epistemically
justified. Early versions of such arguments largely relied on metaphors and analogies and …

The goal of this article is to expose the structural complexity of citizens' trust in scientific
experts, and to argue for the possibility of a productive cooperation between citizens and …

Field's challenge to platonists is the challenge to explain the reliable match between
mathematical truth and belief. The challenge grounds an objection claiming that platonists …