Human impacts on wildlife stem from both our footprint on the landscape and the presence
of people in wildlife habitat. Each may influence wildlife at very different spatial and temporal …

Abstract Purpose of Review We review and provide comment on issues of scale in
ecological studies in the context of two paradigms used to define landscapes: the patch …

Species' distributions are influenced by a combination of landscape variables and biotic
interactions with other species, including people. Grizzly bears and black bears are …

Human recreation can negatively affect wildlife, particularly on weekends when human
activity is highest (ie, the weekend effect). Much of what we understand about the weekend …

As human activities in natural areas increase, understanding human–wildlife interactions is
crucial. Big data approaches, like large‐scale camera trap studies, are becoming more …

Outdoor recreation on trail networks is a growing form of disturbance for wildlife. However,
few studies have examined behavioural responses by large carnivores to motorised and …

There are now many examples where ecological researchers used non‐Euclidean distance
metrics in geostatistical models that were designed for Euclidean distance, such as those …

Highlights•We tested whether wildlife respond temporally to increased weekend human
activity.•In general, wildlife did not respond temporally to increased weekend human …

Some species are valued for their direct usefulness to society, through immediate financial
returns from market activities such as harvesting or ecotourism. But many are valued for their …

Increasing resource extraction and human activity are reshaping species' spatial
distributions in human‐altered landscape and consequently shaping the dynamics of …