Importance Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly common in cancer surgery. A
recent randomized clinical trial has brought into question the safety of minimally invasive …

Simple Summary Despite being a preventable disease, cervical cancer still causes morbidity
and deaths worldwide. In the early stages (FIGO IA1 with lymph-vascular space invasion …

The entire landscape of cancer management in primary care, from case identification to the
management of people living with and beyond cancer, is evolving rapidly in the face of the …

PURPOSE To compare the disease-free survival (DFS) between open and minimally
invasive radical hysterectomies (RH) performed in academic medical institutions METHODS …

Objectives Intraoperative tumor manipulation and dissemination may possibly compromise
survival of women with early-stage cervical cancer who undergo minimally-invasive radical …

Objective To compare survival outcomes of primary laparoscopic radical hysterectomy
(LRH) and open radical hysterectomy (ORH) in patients with FIGO stage IB cervical cancer …

Background In the phase 3 LACC trial and a subsequent population-level review, minimally
invasive radical hysterectomy was shown to be associated with worse disease-free survival …

Plain language summary The use of robotic‐assisted keyhole surgery in gynaecology has
expanded in recent years owing to technical advances. These include 3D viewing leading to …

Objectives To report the trends in surgical approaches and compare the major surgical
complication rates of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer …

Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) has many benefits, in the form of reduced postoperative
morbidity, improved recovery and reduced inpatient stay. It is imperative, however, when …