Philosophers usually acknowledge two individually necessary and jointly sufficient
conditions for a person to be morally responsible for an action, ie, susceptible to be praised …

Section 1 establishes a common ground conception of attention no more controversial than
the established experimental paradigms for attention. This conception explicates the …

People seem to hold the human driver to be primarily responsible when their partially
automated vehicle crashes, yet is this reasonable? While the driver is often required to …

Why do we punish negligence? Some current accounts raise the possibility that it can be
explained by the kinds of processes that lead us to punish ordinary harmful acts, such as …

Movements of the Mind is about what it is to be an agent. Focusing on mental agency, it
integrates multiple approaches, from philosophical analysis of the metaphysics of agency to …

A prominent finding in causal cognition research is people's tendency to attribute increased
causality to atypical actions. If two agents jointly cause an outcome (conjunctive causation) …

Philosophers, psychologists, and economists have reached the consensus that one can use
two different kinds of regulation to achieve self-control. Synchronic regulation uses willpower …

Why do we punish negligence? Leading accounts explain away the punishment of
negligence as a consequence of other, well-known phenomena: outcome bias, character …

The situationist experiments demonstrate that most people's behaviour is influenced by
environmental factors much more than we expect, and that ordinary people can be led to …

Many philosophers think that a necessary condition on moral blameworthiness is that the
wrongdoer can reasonably be expected to avoid the action for which she is blamed. Those …