This article addresses whether autonomy is being adequately protected within therapeutic
jurisprudence models. It first outlines the history and theory of therapeutic jurisprudence …

Through theoretical and empirical examination of legal frameworks for court diversion, this
book interrogates law's complicity in the debilitation of disabled people. In a post …

While the manifestation of therapeutic jurisprudence in specialty courts such as mental
health and drug courts has received attention in the literature, there is little scholarship on …

Issues of mental health and mental illness inform the current crisis in the criminal justice
system and inspire calls for reform. Specialized mental health courts (MHCs) address the …

Objective: This systematic review synthesizes mental health court (MHC) research across
the United States and Canada. This study reviews and compares the operations and …

Introduction As a response to the COVID-19 pandemic, many treatment courts shifted to
offering teleservices. We sought to examine the barriers that clients faced when transitioning …

Résumé Les tribunaux de santé mentale (TSM) proposent un cheminement judiciaire
alternatif qui est adapté aux besoins des personnes psychiatrisées et judiciarisées, une …

According to Chiao in his contribution to this book, the desirability of the use of AI in
sentencing should be evaluated by comparing computers to the status quo ante, rather than …

This study empirically examines the associations between legal representation and four key
outcomes in mental health courts. The outcomes include whether eligible defendants chose …