[HTML][HTML] Evaluation of the endorsement of the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analysis (PRISMA) statement on the quality of published …

N Panic, E Leoncini, G de Belvis, W Ricciardi, S Boccia - PloS one, 2013 - journals.plos.org
Introduction PRISMA statement was published in 2009 in order to set standards in the
reporting of systematic reviews and meta-analyses. Our aim was to evaluate the impact of …

[HTML][HTML] Systematic review adherence to methodological or reporting quality

K Pussegoda, L Turner, C Garritty, A Mayhew… - Systematic reviews, 2017 - Springer
Background Guidelines for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic
reviews (SRs) were developed to contribute to implementing evidence-based health care …

[PDF][PDF] Principais itens para relatar Revisões sistemáticas e Meta-análises: A recomendação PRISMA

TF Galvão, TSA Pansani… - Epidemiologia e serviços …, 2015 - SciELO Public Health
Revisões sistemáticas e meta-análises se tornaram extremamente importantes na
assistência à saúde. Clínicos as leem para se manterem atualizados em suas áreas, 1, 2 e …

[HTML][HTML] Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff, DG Altman… - International journal of …, 2010 - Elsevier
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses have become increasingly important in health care.
Clinicians read them to keep up to date with their field, 1, 2 and they are often used as a …

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement

D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff, DG Altman… - Annals of internal …, 2009 - acpjournals.org
Moher and colleagues introduce PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic
Reviews and Meta-Analyses), an update of the QUOROM guidelines for reporting systematic …

The PRISMA statement for reporting systematic reviews and meta-analyses of studies that evaluate health care interventions: explanation and elaboration

A Liberati, DG Altman, J Tetzlaff, C Mulrow… - Annals of internal …, 2009 - acpjournals.org
Systematic reviews and meta-analyses are essential to summarize evidence relating to
efficacy and safety of health care interventions accurately and reliably. The clarity and …

Contrast induced nephropathy: updated ESUR contrast media safety committee guidelines

F Stacul, AJ van der Molen, P Reimer, JAW Webb… - European …, 2011 - Springer
Abstract Purpose The Contrast Media Safety Committee (CMSC) of the European Society of
Urogenital Radiology (ESUR) has updated its 1999 guidelines on contrast medium-induced …

AMSTAR is a reliable and valid measurement tool to assess the methodological quality of systematic reviews

BJ Shea, C Hamel, GA Wells, LM Bouter… - Journal of clinical …, 2009 - Elsevier
OBJECTIVE: Our purpose was to measure the agreement, reliability, construct validity, and
feasibility of a measurement tool to assess systematic reviews (AMSTAR). STUDY DESIGN …

Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement (Chinese edition)

D Moher, A Liberati, J Tetzlaff… - Journal of …, 2009 - scholars.uthscsa.edu
Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement
(Chinese edition) — Scholars @ UT Health San Antonio Skip to main navigation Skip to search …

Contrast-induced nephropathy following angiography and cardiac interventions

R Rear, RM Bell, DJ Hausenloy - Heart, 2016 - heart.bmj.com
Contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN), also known as contrast-induced acute kidney injury, is
an iatrogenic renal injury that follows intravascular administration of radio-opaque contrast …