Replication—an important, uncommon, and misunderstood practice—is gaining
appreciation in psychology. Achieving replicability is important for making research …

Many philosophers of science and methodologists have argued that the ability to repeat
studies and obtain similar results is an essential component of science. A finding is elevated …

The credibility of scientific claims depends upon the transparency of the research products
upon which they are based (eg, study protocols, data, materials, and analysis scripts). As …

The debate about false positives in psychological research has led to a demand for higher
statistical power. To meet this demand, researchers need to collect data from larger samples …

What drives public beliefs about the credibility of a scientific field? This question is
increasingly important, with recent discussion of a “reproducibility crisis” affecting many …

Replication failures of past findings in several scientific disciplines, including psychology,
medicine, and experimental economics, have created a “crisis of confidence” among …

In methodological and practical debates about replications in science, it is (often implicitly)
assumed that replications will affect public trust in science. In this preregistered experiment …

Replication is vital for increasing precision and accuracy of scientific claims. However, when
replications “succeed” or “fail,” they could have reputational consequences for the claim's …

The scientific enterprise has long been based on the presumption of replication, although
scientists have recently become aware of various corruptions of the enterprise that have hurt …

Several meta-analytical attempts to reproduce results of empirical research have failed in
recent years, prompting scholars and news media to diagnose a “replication crisis” and …