The ethical position underpinning decisionmaking is an important concern for conservation
biologists when setting priorities for interventions. The recent debate on how best to protect …

Here, we address the question of if/to what extent human–wildlife conflict (HWC) can be
reduced or mitigated by supra-regional or even global approaches, or whether case-and …

Human–wildlife conflicts, such as crop‐raiding, increase as people expand their agricultural
activities into wildlife habitats. Crop‐raiding can reduce tolerance toward species that are …

Turkey has viable populations of many carnivore species of the Western Palearctic. Among
those, ursids and canids are represented by brown bear (Ursus arctos) and 3 canid species …

Human‐carnivore coexistence is a multi‐faceted issue that requires an understanding of the
diverse attitudes and perspectives of the communities living with large carnivores. To inform …

Damage to homesteads by brown bears (Ursus arctos) has become commonplace in Asia,
Europe, and the Americas. Science‐based solutions for preventing damages can contribute …

Human–wildlife interactions are often associated with a myriad of stakeholder groups,
intense political scrutiny, and limited biological data, creating complex decision‐making …

Conflicts between humans and bears have occurred since prehistory. Through time, the
catalogue of human–bear conflicts (HBC) has been changing depending on the values and …

Interaction between hominins and carnivores has been common and constant through
human evolution and generated mutual pressures similar to those present in worldwide …

Human persecution and habitat loss have endangered large carnivore populations
worldwide, but some are recovering, exacerbating old conflicts. Carnivores can injure and …