[HTML][HTML] Method for conducting systematic literature review and meta-analysis for environmental science research

W Mengist, T Soromessa, G Legese - MethodsX, 2020 - Elsevier
This paper presents a method to conduct a systematic literature review (SLR) and meta-
analysis studies on environmental science. SLR is a process that allowed to collect relevant …

Continuance intention of online technologies: A systematic literature review

M Yan, R Filieri, M Gorton - International Journal of Information …, 2021 - Elsevier
Given the dynamic nature of digital technologies, understanding why users intend to
continue to use them or not is important for practitioners and academics alike. This paper …

Analysing data and undertaking meta‐analyses

JJ Deeks, JPT Higgins, DG Altman… - … systematic reviews of …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
This chapter describes the principles and methods used to carry out a meta‐analysis for a
comparison of two interventions for the main types of data encountered. A very common and …

Delayed vs early umbilical cord clamping for preterm infants: a systematic review and meta-analysis

M Fogarty, DA Osborn, L Askie, AL Seidler… - American journal of …, 2018 - Elsevier
Background The effects of delayed cord clamping of the umbilical cord in preterm infants are
unclear. Objective We sought to compare the effects of delayed vs early cord clamping on …

Understanding scoping reviews: Definition, purpose, and process

J Peterson, PF Pearce, LA Ferguson… - Journal of the …, 2017 - journals.lww.com
Background/purpose: Scoping review design represents a methodology that allows
assessment of emerging evidence, as well as a first step in research development. Despite …

A scoping review of rapid review methods

AC Tricco, J Antony, W Zarin, L Strifler, M Ghassemi… - BMC medicine, 2015 - Springer
Background Rapid reviews are a form of knowledge synthesis in which components of the
systematic review process are simplified or omitted to produce information in a timely …

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015: elaboration and explanation

L Shamseer, D Moher, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Bmj, 2015 - bmj.com
Protocols of systematic reviews and meta-analyses allow for planning and documentation of
review methods, act as a guard against arbitrary decision making during review conduct …

Preferred reporting items for systematic review and meta-analysis protocols (PRISMA-P) 2015 statement

D Moher, L Shamseer, M Clarke, D Ghersi, A Liberati… - Systematic reviews, 2015 - Springer
Systematic reviews should build on a protocol that describes the rationale, hypothesis, and
planned methods of the review; few reviews report whether a protocol exists. Detailed, well …

Starting a review

TJ Lasserson, J Thomas… - Cochrane handbook for …, 2019 - Wiley Online Library
This chapter introduces some of the key considerations for review authors who are about to
start a systematic review. Because the priorities of decision makers and consumers may be …

Estimating the sample mean and standard deviation from the sample size, median, range and/or interquartile range

X Wan, W Wang, J Liu, T Tong - BMC medical research methodology, 2014 - Springer
Background In systematic reviews and meta-analysis, researchers often pool the results of
the sample mean and standard deviation from a set of similar clinical trials. A number of the …