Open Science holds the promise to make scientific endeavours more inclusive, participatory,
understandable, accessible and re-usable for large audiences. However, making processes …

The past decade has witnessed a worldwide explosion of work aimed at illuminating judicial-
behavior: the choices judges make and the consequences of their choices. We focus on …

Introdução: O artigo faz uma revisão sistemática para explicar a trajetória do conceito de
“judicialização da política” na literatura produzida pelas ciências sociais sobre o Supremo …

Comparing and contextualizing what judges say about the law is the job of comparative
legal analysis. Studying internal and external forces that explain the judges' choices and …

This article introduces a new dataset to study Israeli politics. Taking an agenda-setting
approach, the dataset includes longitudinal series of political outputs—legislative, executive …

This article presents HUNCOURT, a complex open legal database for the quantitative
analysis of the practice of the Hungarian Constitutional Court (HCC). Covering all HCC …

Once the sole province of US scholars—and mostly political scientists at that—researchers
throughout the world, drawing on history, economics, law, and psychology, are analyzing …

Many court observers have argued that judges are capable of avoiding the use of
extraneous factors in decision-making. This study examines the influence of seemingly …

The study distinguishes between three normative approaches that view diversity in the
judiciary as a desirable ideal, outlines their expected empirical implications for judicial …

Comparative judicial behaviour seeks to illuminate the choices judges make and the
consequences of their choices for society. This chapter begins with a brief discussion of …