Within the last decade, abstract argumentation has emerged as a central field in Artificial
Intelligence. Besides providing a core formalism for many advanced argumentation systems …

An abstract framework for structured arguments is presented, which instantiates Dung's ('On
the Acceptability of Arguments and its Fundamental Role in Nonmonotonic Reasoning …

This paper builds on the recent ASPIC+ formalism, to develop a general framework for
argumentation with preferences. We motivate a revised definition of conflict free sets of …

In this paper, we define a labelling-based justification status of the arguments in an
argumentation framework. Our proposal allows for a more fine-grained notion of a …

We propose an abstract argumentation theory whose dynamics is captured by the
application of belief revision concepts. The theory is deemed as abstract because both the …

In this document, we describe the concepts of ideal semantics and stage semantics for
abstract argumentation in terms of argument labellings. The difference between the …

The ASPIC+ framework is intermediate in abstraction between Dung's argumentation
framework and concrete instantiating logics. This paper generalises ASPIC+ to …

The theory of abstract argumentation frameworks (af s) has, in the main, focused on finite
structures, though there are many significant contexts where argumentation can be regarded …

In this article the argumentation structure of the court's decision in the Popov v. Hayashi case
is formalised in Prakken's (Argument Comput 1: 93–124; 2010) abstract framework for …

Carneades is a recently proposed formalism for structured argumentation with varying proof
standards, inspired by legal reasoning, but more generally applicable. Its distinctive feature …