A coherent practice of mens rea ('guilty mind') ascription in criminal law presupposes a
concept of mens rea which is insensitive to the moral valence of an action's outcome. For …

Moral values bind communities together and foster cooperation, yet these same values can
lead to the derogation and marginalization of outgroups. Five studies tested a theoretical …

In a series of ten preregistered experiments (N= 2043), we investigate the effect of outcome
valence on judgments of probability, negligence, and culpability–a phenomenon sometimes …

Whereas in certain domains, the law relies on terms of art (eg,“injunction,”“double
jeopardy,”“punitive damages,” and “bankruptcy”), in others—in particular in criminal law—it …

Norm violations have been demonstrated to impact a wide range of seemingly non-
normative judgments. Among other things, when agents' actions violate prescriptive norms …

We provide new findings that add to the growing body of empirical evidence that important
epistemic intuitions converge across cultures. Specifically, we selected three recent studies …

Previous research has documented that judging an agent causing an accident mainly relies
on considerations about the outcome endured by the victim and the intention to cause harm …

This chapter provides a critical though comprehensive review of the empirical literature on
the folk concept of intentional action. Recently, experimental evidence suggested that …

The debate regarding the nature of joint action has come to a stalemate due to a
dependence on intuitional methods. Normativists, such as Margaret Gilbert, argue that …

In this paper, we provide new findings that add to the growing body of empirical evidence
that important epistemic intuitions converge across cultures. Specifically, we selected three …