Moral tribalism: Moral judgments of actions supporting ingroup interests depend on collective narcissism

K Bocian, A Cichocka, B Wojciszke - Journal of Experimental Social …, 2021 - Elsevier
In this article, we examine how group identity and protection of group interests shape
morality judgments. We argue that actions serving ingroup interests are more likely to be …

The morality of war: A review and research agenda

HM Watkins - Perspectives on Psychological Science, 2020 - journals.sagepub.com
What is judged as morally right and wrong in war? I argue that despite many decades of
research on moral psychology and the psychology of intergroup conflict, social psychology …

[HTML][HTML] Психологические факторы отношения к войне: теоретический обзор

ОА Гулевич, ЕН Осин - Социология власти, 2023 - cyberleninka.ru
Люди демонстрируют разное отношение к военным действиям как способу
разрешения международных конфликтов. В этой статье мы рассматриваем специфику …

A fundamental asymmetry in judgments of soldiers at war.

HM Watkins, GP Goodwin - Journal of Experimental Psychology …, 2020 - psycnet.apa.org
How should we judge a soldier who is fighting for an unjust cause? Is such a soldier the
moral equal of a soldier fighting for an opposing, just cause? According to traditional just war …

[HTML][HTML] How does identifying with one's nation predict support for wars? The role of secure national identification and national narcissism

O Gulevich, E Osin - Personality and Individual Differences, 2025 - Elsevier
National identity has a significant influence on people's attitudes and behavior. However,
several researchers make a distinction between secure national identification and national …

Dark Triad and the attitude toward military violence against civilians: The role of moral disengagement

O Gulevich, E Osin, D Chernov - European Journal of Social …, 2024 - Wiley Online Library
Scholars pay great attention to sociopsychological factors that predict attitudes toward
military action, but they rarely address personality variables. The purpose of this study was …

Camouflaged liability: How the distinction between civilians and soldiers influences moral judgement of permissible harm in war

JC Marulanda‐Hernández, A Wiegmann… - European Journal of …, 2024 - Wiley Online Library
Previous research has shown that people judge sacrificing a few people to save a larger
number to be morally permissible when the intervention targets the threat but not when it …

Trolley dilemma in the sky: Context matters when civilians and cadets make remotely piloted aircraft decisions

M Christen, D Narvaez, JD Zenk, M Villano… - PloS one, 2021 - journals.plos.org
Crews operating remotely piloted aircrafts (RPAs) in military operations may be among the
few that truly experience tragic dilemmas similar to the famous Trolley Problem. In order to …

[HTML][HTML] Harnessing dehumanization theory, modern media, and an intervention tournament to reduce support for retributive war crimes

AP Landry, K Fincher, N Barr, NP Brosowsky… - Journal of Experimental …, 2024 - Elsevier
We demonstrate how psychological scientists can curate rich-yet-accessible media to
intervene on conflict-escalating attitudes during the earliest stages of violent conflicts …

The Influence of Group Favoritism on Moral Judgment--Evidence From Event-Related Potential

Y Bo, Z Lihua - Psychological Reports, 2024 - journals.sagepub.com
When judging the morality of an action, individuals may exhibit a bias stemming from group
favoritism. It leads to the expression of different moral evaluations of the same behaviors …