19 moral judgment
MR Waldmann, J Nagel… - The Oxford handbook of …, 2012 - books.google.com
The past decade has seen a renewed interest in moral psychology. A unique feature of the
present endeavor is its unprecedented interdisciplinarity. For the first time, cognitive, social …
present endeavor is its unprecedented interdisciplinarity. For the first time, cognitive, social …
Do judgments about freedom and responsibility depend on who you are? Personality differences in intuitions about compatibilism and incompatibilism
Recently, there has been an increased interest in folk intuitions about freedom and moral
responsibility from both philosophers and psychologists. We aim to extend our …
responsibility from both philosophers and psychologists. We aim to extend our …
Negativity bias, positivity bias, and valence asymmetries: Explaining the differential processing of positive and negative information
Distinguishing between “good” and “bad” is a fundamental task for all organisms. However,
people seem to process positive and negative information differentially, described in the …
people seem to process positive and negative information differentially, described in the …
Mens rea ascription, expertise and outcome effects: Professional judges surveyed
M Kneer, S Bourgeois-Gironde - Cognition, 2017 - Elsevier
A coherent practice of mens rea ('guilty mind') ascription in criminal law presupposes a
concept of mens rea which is insensitive to the moral valence of an action's outcome. For …
concept of mens rea which is insensitive to the moral valence of an action's outcome. For …
[HTML][HTML] Outcome effects, moral luck and the hindsight bias
In a series of ten preregistered experiments (N= 2043), we investigate the effect of outcome
valence on judgments of probability, negligence, and culpability–a phenomenon sometimes …
valence on judgments of probability, negligence, and culpability–a phenomenon sometimes …
Individual differences, judgment biases, and theory-of-mind: Deconstructing the intentional action side effect asymmetry
When the side effect of an action involves moral considerations (eg when a chairman's
pursuit of profits harms the environment) it tends to influence theory-of-mind judgments. On …
pursuit of profits harms the environment) it tends to influence theory-of-mind judgments. On …
Causation and the silly norm effect
Whereas in certain domains, the law relies on terms of art (eg,“injunction,”“double
jeopardy,”“punitive damages,” and “bankruptcy”), in others—in particular in criminal law—it …
jeopardy,”“punitive damages,” and “bankruptcy”), in others—in particular in criminal law—it …
[PDF][PDF] The fragmented folk: More evidence of stable individual differences in moral judgments and folk intuitions
In a series of five experiments, we demonstrate that moral judgments and folk intuitions are
often predictably fragmented. Drawing on the domains of ethics and action theory, we …
often predictably fragmented. Drawing on the domains of ethics and action theory, we …
The pervasive impact of ignorance
L Kirfel, J Phillips - Cognition, 2023 - Elsevier
Norm violations have been demonstrated to impact a wide range of seemingly non-
normative judgments. Among other things, when agents' actions violate prescriptive norms …
normative judgments. Among other things, when agents' actions violate prescriptive norms …
Reasonableness on the Clapham Omnibus: Exploring the Outcome-Sensitive Folk Concept of Reasonable
M Kneer - Judicial decision-making: Integrating empirical and …, 2022 - Springer
The reasonable person standard is of great importance to US criminal and tort law.
According to the law, whether or not an agent acted reasonably does not depend on …
According to the law, whether or not an agent acted reasonably does not depend on …