For over half a century, the Supreme Court's free exercise jurisprudence has been
characterized by a less-than-forthright treatment of precedent. One chapter in this tale of …

The COVID-19 pandemic ushered in a spate of free exercise challenges to local
governments' stay-at-home orders. A close examination of over one hundred federal court …

The idea of institutional religious freedom has become increasingly controversial, especially
in the United States, and pressure for such freedom has been growing. The notion that …

This essay explores judicial responses to legal restrictions on worship during the COVID-19
pandemic and draws two lessons, one comparative and one relating specifically to US law …

This article argues that the Supreme Court should not require a religious exemption from
vaccine mandates. For children, who cannot yet make autonomous religious decision …

Viewed closely and comprehensively, Masterpiece Cakeshop, far from simply being the
narrow, shallow, and modest decision many have taken it to be, is a rich, multi-faceted …

Fifty years ago, in Wisconsin v. Yoder, the Supreme Court famously indicated that" religion"
denotes a communal rather than a purely individual phenomenon. An organized group like …

Americans are beset by disagreement about the First Amendment. Progressive scholars are
attacking the liberal view, famously associated with Ronald Dworkin, that First Amendment …

Detective Harry Bosch is behind the wheel, with his partner in the passenger seat. The
Conviction Integrity Unit is digging into one of Bosch's old cases, and the laconic detective …

On Sunday, July 19, 2020, at approximately 5: 00 pm, a seventytwo-year-old attorney named
Roy Den Hollander disguised himself as a Federal Express deliveryman and rang the …