Water utilities need to begin now to evaluate their costs for complying with a lower MCL for
arsenic. Compliance with a revised arsenic maximum contaminant level (MCL) for drinking …

Total and hexavalent chromium occurrence in the United States was investigated using
three available datasets. The National Chromium and Boron Occurrence Survey, the US …

Compared with other drinking water regulatory determinations, the cost implications of a
perchlorate maximum contaminant level are relatively low because of the chemical's limited …

Rapid response is critical following natural disasters like wildfire. Fire, runoff, and erosion
risks are highly heterogeneous in space, creating an urgent need for rapid, spatially-explicit …

In determining how to set regulatory standards or guidelines for contaminants found in
drinking water supplies, decision-makers typically try to balance public health protection …

No other resource serves as many purposes as water. It is widely used in industry, in electric
energy production, in farming and ranching, and of course by households for drinking …

Page 1 American Water Works Association RESEARCH FOUNDATION Critical Assessment of
Radon Removal Systems for Drinking Water Supplies Subject Area: Water Treatment Page 2 …

Cross‐connection control and backflow prevention are not new concerns for water utilities.
The US Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA) is considering regulation of drinking …

This working paper examines the national costs associated with federal drinking water
regulations promulgated by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) under the …

A prior assessment estimating the national compliance costs associated with perchlorate
(Russell et al. 2009) was updated to account for utility actions taken in response to state …