Abstract The Journal Impact Factor and other indicators that assess the average citation rate
of articles in a journal are consulted by many academics and research evaluators, despite …

Purpose This study explores the use and perceptions of scholarly journal ranking lists in the
management field based on stakeholders' lived experience. Design/methodology/approach …

Existing theorizations on how the proliferation of market-based technologies within
universities come to foster so-called academic performer subjectivities have mainly drawn …

Journal lists for the assessment of academic performance are widely used worldwide and
inform many important decisions, such as, academic workload, salary, hiring, promotion, and …

Responsible assessment promotes expert judgment and opposes sole reliance on research
metrics when assessing research excellence. While many institutions and national research …

Purpose This paper undertakes a structured literature review to analyse the literature on
performance management and measurement (PMM) in universities over the last four …

Academics often judge themselves and are judged by others according to the status of the
journals in which they publish. Little is known about whether individual scholars would …

This commentary/reflection offers a critical analysis of four articles presenting literature
reviews concerning Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) research in accounting …

This study investigates how the specificity of a university business model supports the
dominance and persistence of a handful of elite non‐profit universities, while considering …

This paper revisits the debate about the potential effect of poor journal quality rankings on
accounting education and accounting history scholarship in the UK to see what can be …