Systematic reviews of diagnostic test accuracy (DTA) studies are fundamental to the
decision making process in evidence based medicine. Although such studies are regarded …

Abstract Background The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve
transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the …

The majority of academic papers are scarcely cited while a few others are highly cited. A
large number of studies indicate that there are many factors influencing the number of …

Methods The methods require detailed information on study inclusion and exclusion criteria,
such as study characteristics (eg, PICOS, length of follow-up) and report characteristics (eg …

Reviews of published scientific literature are a valuable resource that can underline best
practices in medicine and clarify clinical controversies. Among the various types of reviews …

Evidence-based practice is a dominant paradigm in healthcare that emphasizes the
importance of ensuring the translation of the best available, relevant research evidence into …

Systematic reviews of imaging research represent a tool to better understand test accuracy
or the efficacy of interventions. Like any type of research, appropriate methods must be …

Objectives To assess reporting quality of studies using routinely collected health data (RCD)
to inform the REporting of studies Conducted using Observational Routinely collected health …

In this paper, we made a survey on the prediction capability of bibliometric indices and
alternative metrics on the future success of articles by establishing a machine learning …

Aim To identify the top 100 most‐cited case reports and case series published in Endodontic
journals and to analyse their bibliometric characteristics. Methodology The Clarivate …