Sensitivity to interaural time differences (ITDs) in acoustic hearing involves comparison of
interaurally frequency-matched inputs. Bilateral cochlear-implant arrays are, however, only …

Bilateral cochlear implant (BCI) users only have very limited spatial hearing abilities. Speech
coding strategies transmit interaural level differences (ILDs) but in a distorted manner …

Children who are deaf and receive bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) perform better on
spatial hearing tasks using bilateral rather than unilateral inputs; however, they …

Bilateral cochlear implantation has provided access to some of the benefits of binaural
hearing enjoyed by normal-hearing (NH) listeners. However, a gap in performance still …

Bilateral cochlear implants (BiCIs) result in several benefits, including improvements in
speech understanding in noise and sound source localization. However, the benefit bilateral …

Typically, the coding strategies of cochlear implant audio processors discard acoustic
temporal fine structure information (TFS), which may be related to the poor perception of …

For a frontal target in spatially symmetrically placed interferers, normal hearing (NH)
listeners can use “better-ear glimpsing” to select time-frequency segments with favorable …

Cochlear implant (CI) users with a prelingual onset of hearing loss show poor sensitivity to
interaural time differences (ITDs), an important cue for sound localization and speech …

When listening with a cochlear implant through one ear and acoustically through the other,
binaural benefits and spatial hearing abilities are generally poorer than in other bilaterally …

Interaural time difference (ITD) sensitivity with cochlear implant stimulation is remarkably
similar to envelope ITD sensitivity using conventional acoustic stimulation. This holds true for …