We examined the effects of order of presentation on the moral judgments of professional
philosophers and two comparison groups. All groups showed similar‐sized order effects on …

We examined the effects of framing and order of presentation on professional philosophers'
judgments about a moral puzzle case (the “trolley problem”) and a version of the Tversky & …

In recent years, there has been much concern expressed about the underrepresentation of
women in academic philosophy in the English-speaking world. A full explanation of this …

Many philosophers appeal to intuitions to support some philosophical views. However, there
is reason to be concerned about this practice as scientific evidence has documented …

Conventional sacrificial moral dilemmas propose directly causing some harm to prevent
greater harm. Theory suggests that accepting such actions (consistent with utilitarian …

Experimental philosophers have empirically challenged the connection between intuition
and philosophical expertise. This paper reviews these challenges alongside other research …

Recent work in experimental philosophy has indicated that intuitions may be subject to
several forms of bias, thereby casting doubt on the viability of intuition as an evidential …

While thought experiments play an important role in contemporary analytic philosophy,
much remains unclear about thought experiments. In particular, it is still unclear whether the …

In philosophical thought experiments, as in ordinary discourse, our understanding of verbal
case descriptions is enriched by automatic comprehension inferences. Such inferences …

This article examines whether people share the Gettier intuition (viz. that someone who has
a true justified belief that p may nonetheless fail to know that p) in 24 sites, located in 23 …