Importance Minimally invasive techniques are increasingly common in cancer surgery. A
recent randomized clinical trial has brought into question the safety of minimally invasive …

This review sought to evaluate the current literature on reproductive and oncologic
outcomes after fertility-sparing surgery for early stage cervical cancer (stage IA1–IB1) …

Background There are limited data from retrospective studies regarding whether survival
outcomes after laparoscopic or robot-assisted radical hysterectomy (minimally invasive …

Background Minimally invasive surgery was adopted as an alternative to laparotomy (open
surgery) for radical hysterectomy in patients with early-stage cervical cancer before high …

Background The possible advantages of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) versus
open radical hysterectomy (RH) have not been well reviewed systematically. The aim of this …

OBJECTIVE: Traditional techniques of sentinel lymph node (SLN) mapping for endometrial
and cervical cancer present challenges which may be overcome with newer technologies …

Aim Recently, the safety of laparoscopic radical hysterectomy (LRH) has been called into
question in early-stage cervical cancer. This study aimed to evaluate overall survival (OS) …

Objective: Studies comparing the prognostic results between laparoscopic radical
hysterectomy (LRH) and abdominal radical hysterectomy (ARH) in cervical cancer reported …

Objectives To report the trends in surgical approaches and compare the major surgical
complication rates of laparoscopic and abdominal radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer …

Background This meta-analysis comprehensively compared intraoperative and
postoperative complications between minimally invasive surgery (MIS) and laparotomy in …