[HTML][HTML] What is open peer review? A systematic review
T Ross-Hellauer - F1000Research, 2017 - ncbi.nlm.nih.gov
Background:“Open peer review”(OPR), despite being a major pillar of Open Science, has
neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations …
neither a standardized definition nor an agreed schema of its features and implementations …
Power failure: why small sample size undermines the reliability of neuroscience
A study with low statistical power has a reduced chance of detecting a true effect, but it is
less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant …
less well appreciated that low power also reduces the likelihood that a statistically significant …
No raw data, no science: another possible source of the reproducibility crisis
T Miyakawa - Molecular brain, 2020 - Springer
A reproducibility crisis is a situation where many scientific studies cannot be reproduced.
Inappropriate practices of science, such as HARKing, p-hacking, and selective reporting of …
Inappropriate practices of science, such as HARKing, p-hacking, and selective reporting of …
The future (s) of open science
P Mirowski - Social studies of science, 2018 - journals.sagepub.com
Almost everyone is enthusiastic that 'open science'is the wave of the future. Yet when one
looks seriously at the flaws in modern science that the movement proposes to remedy, the …
looks seriously at the flaws in modern science that the movement proposes to remedy, the …
The natural selection of bad science
PE Smaldino, R McElreath - Royal Society open science, 2016 - royalsocietypublishing.org
Poor research design and data analysis encourage false-positive findings. Such poor
methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from …
methods persist despite perennial calls for improvement, suggesting that they result from …
Transparency, reproducibility, and the credibility of economics research
G Christensen, E Miguel - Journal of Economic Literature, 2018 - aeaweb.org
There is growing interest in enhancing research transparency and reproducibility in
economics and other scientific fields. We survey existing work on these topics within …
economics and other scientific fields. We survey existing work on these topics within …
Misconduct accounts for the majority of retracted scientific publications
FC Fang, RG Steen… - Proceedings of the …, 2012 - National Acad Sciences
A detailed review of all 2,047 biomedical and life-science research articles indexed by
PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were …
PubMed as retracted on May 3, 2012 revealed that only 21.3% of retractions were …
[HTML][HTML] Deep impact: unintended consequences of journal rank
Most researchers acknowledge an intrinsic hierarchy in the scholarly journals ('journal rank')
that they submit their work to, and adjust not only their submission but also their reading …
that they submit their work to, and adjust not only their submission but also their reading …
Misconduct policies, academic culture and career stage, not gender or pressures to publish, affect scientific integrity
The honesty and integrity of scientists is widely believed to be threatened by pressures to
publish, unsupportive research environments, and other structural, sociological and …
publish, unsupportive research environments, and other structural, sociological and …
[图书][B] Publish or perish: Perceived benefits versus unintended consequences
IA Moosa - 2024 - books.google.com
In this thoroughly revised second edition of Publish or Perish, Imad A. Moosa extends and
develops his analysis of the continual pressure to publish research which plagues the …
develops his analysis of the continual pressure to publish research which plagues the …