Aim: This study aimed to compare clinical and oncological outcomes of robot-assisted and
laparoscopic surgery for rectal cancer. Materials and Methods: We searched …

Background The usage of robotic surgery in rectal cancer is increasing, but there is an
ongoing debate as to whether it provides any benefit. The aim of the present study was to …

Background Robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery has several advantages over
conventional laparoscopy. However, population-based comparative studies for low anterior …

Objective To compare short-term results of total mesorectal excision (TME) for mid and low
rectal cancer, achieved by transanal (TaTME), laparoscopic (LaTME), and open (OpTME) …

Background Robotic lobectomy has been described for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC).
Our objectives were to (1) evaluate the use of robotic lobectomy over time,(2) identify factors …

Background Management of low rectal cancer continues to be a challenge, and decision
making regarding the need for an abdominoperineal resection (APR) in patients with low …

The global numbers of robotic gastrointestinal surgeries are increasing. However, the
evidence base for robotic gastrointestinal surgery does not yet support its widespread …

Background Minimally invasive surgery has been considered as an alternative to open
surgery by surgeons for colorectal cancer. However, the efficacy and safety profiles of …

Advanced robotic technology makes it easier to perform total mesorectal excision
procedures in the narrow pelvis for rectal cancer while maintaining the advantages of …

Background Robotic surgery has gained popularity in surgical oncology. Rectal cancer
surgery, known to be technically challenging, may benefit from robotics in achieving better …