Abstract Background The PRISMA Statement is a reporting guideline designed to improve
transparency of systematic reviews (SRs) and meta-analyses. Seven extensions to the …

Background Guidelines for assessing methodological and reporting quality of systematic
reviews (SRs) were developed to contribute to implementing evidence-based health care …

Objectives A priori registration of systematic review protocols in international prospective
register of systematic reviews (PROSPERO) can help reduce selective reporting of …

Objective We aimed at testing if a correlation between adverse drug reactions relative risks
estimated from meta-analyses and disproportionality analyses calculated from …

Background Previous research looking at published systematic reviews has shown that their
search strategies are often suboptimal and that librarian involvement, though recommended …

Background A high-quality search strategy is considered an essential component of
systematic reviews but many do not contain reproducible search strategies. It is unclear if …

Background Several standards have been developed to assess methodological quality of
systematic reviews (SR). One widely used tool is the AMSTAR. A recent update-AMSTAR 2 …

Objectives There is an increasing recognition that research outcomes should resonate with
patients rather than fixating on technical aspects of interventions. We aimed to assess the …

Abstract A Measurement Tool to Assess Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) is a commonly used
tool to assess the quality of systematic reviews; however, modifications are needed to …

Recently, several meta‐analyses (MAs) have focused on the health effects of resveratrol.
However, the methodological and reporting quality of these MAs has not yet been fully …