Objective: Over the past 4 decades, discrepant research findings have emerged in the juror–
confession literature, prompting the need for a systematic review and meta-analysis that …

Objective: Recently, experimental work on racial bias in legal settings has diverged from real-
world field data demonstrating racial disparities, instead often producing null or potential …

Objective: The present study integrates several distinct lines of jury decision-making
research by examining how the racial identities of the defendant and an informant witness …

Objective: Because confessions are sometimes unreliable, it is important to understand how
jurors evaluate confession evidence. We conducted a content analysis testing an attribution …

Judges are increasingly using “implicit bias” instructions in jury trials in an effort to reduce
the influence of jurors' biases on judgment. In this article, we report on findings from a large …

Jury simulation research has been the subject of longstanding criticism in regards to
ecological validity. One additional factor that has received little attention that may also …

In past research on criminal stereotypes, individuals of different races have been
stereotyped as being more likely to commit certain types of crimes. In this article, we draw on …

Two studies examined the effectiveness of the Unconscious Bias Juror (UBJ) video and
instructions at reducing racial bias in Black and White mock-jurors' decisions, perceptions …

An overlooked observation in the literature on double-blind lineups is that double-blind
lineup administrators sometimes engage in behaviors that could influence eyewitnesses …

Judges are human beings. Is their behavior therefore subject to the same effects that
psychology and behavioral economics have documented for convenience samples, like …