A Design Space for Intelligent and Interactive Writing Assistants

M Lee, KI Gero, JJY Chung, SB Shum… - Proceedings of the CHI …, 2024 - dl.acm.org
In our era of rapid technological advancement, the research landscape for writing assistants
has become increasingly fragmented across various research communities. We seek to …

Marg: Multi-agent review generation for scientific papers

M D'Arcy, T Hope, L Birnbaum, D Downey - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2024 - arxiv.org
We study the ability of LLMs to generate feedback for scientific papers and develop MARG, a
feedback generation approach using multiple LLM instances that engage in internal …

What Can Natural Language Processing Do for Peer Review?

I Kuznetsov, OM Afzal, K Dercksen, N Dycke… - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2024 - arxiv.org
The number of scientific articles produced every year is growing rapidly. Providing quality
control over them is crucial for scientists and, ultimately, for the public good. In modern …

A Tale of Two Revisions: Summarizing Changes Across Document Versions

S Tyss, N Modani, A Saxena - Findings of the Association for …, 2024 - aclanthology.org
Document revision is a crucial aspect of the writing process, particularly in collaborative
environments where multiple authors contribute simultaneously. However, current tools lack …

Automated Focused Feedback Generation for Scientific Writing Assistance

E Chamoun, M Schlichktrull, A Vlachos - arXiv preprint arXiv:2405.20477, 2024 - arxiv.org
Scientific writing is a challenging task, particularly for novice researchers who often rely on
feedback from experienced peers. Recent work has primarily focused on improving surface …

CASIMIR: A Corpus of Scientific Articles enhanced with Multiple Author-Integrated Revisions

L Jourdan, F Boudin, N Hernandez… - arXiv preprint arXiv …, 2024 - arxiv.org
Writing a scientific article is a challenging task as it is a highly codified and specific genre,
consequently proficiency in written communication is essential for effectively conveying …

An Interactive Co-Pilot for Accelerated Research Ideation

H Nigam, M Patwardhan, L Vig… - Proceedings of the Third …, 2024 - aclanthology.org
In the realm of research support tools, there exists a notable void in resources tailored
specifically for aiding researchers during the crucial ideation phase of the research life …

Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review (Dagstuhl Seminar 24052)

I Gurevych, A Rogers, NB Shah, J Wang - 2024 - drops.dagstuhl.de
This report documents the program and the outcomes of Dagstuhl Seminar 24052"
Reviewer No. 2: Old and New Problems in Peer Review". This seminar provided a point of …

An Analysis of Tasks and Datasets in Peer Reviewing

M Staudinger, W Kusa, F Piroi… - Proceedings of the Fourth …, 2024 - aclanthology.org
Taking note of the current challenges of the peer review system, this paper inventories the
research tasks for analysing and possibly automating parts of the reviewing process, like …

AutoRef: Generating Refinements of Reviews Given Guidelines

S Chitnis, M Patwardhan, L Vig… - Proceedings of the Fourth …, 2024 - aclanthology.org
When examining reviews of research papers, we can distinguish between two hypothetical
referees: the maximally lenient referee who accepts any paper with a vacuous review and …