We review the literature to identify common problems of decision-making in individuals and
groups. We are guided by a Bayesian framework to explain the interplay between past …

The past 40 years of psychological research on decision making has identified a number of
important cognitive biases. However, the psychological study of decision making tends to …

We develop and test predictions about how demographic differences influence dyadic
deference in multidisciplinary research teams, and how differential patterns of dyadic …

Teams in organizations are becoming more gender diverse as women continue to
participate more in the workforce than ever before. Prior theory and research indicate that …

In this research, we view knowledge-worker teams as open systems that are directly affected
by changes in the external environment. Drawing on the strategic contingency perspective of …

In this paper we address how director expertise impacts a director's social status and
conformity within the board. Our results, derived from two unique multi‐source datasets of …

The human capacity for abstraction is remarkable. We effortlessly form abstract
representations from varied experiences, generalizing and flexibly transferring experiences …

We challenge the social categorization perspective in the team diversity literature by arguing
that stereotypes and not favoritism for members of the same social category govern …

Relational theories of leadership emphasize the relevance of dynamic changes of informal
leadership structures in teams, especially when teams are confronted with new tasks. In this …

Virtuality in organizations has usually been treated as a characteristic that is observed either
at a team or organizational level. However, the penetration of new technologies into our …