The Singapore courts often state that judicial review of executive decision-making ought
only to involve an inquiry into the 'legality'of a decision or the 'decision-making process', and …

In Towering Judges: A Comparative Study of Constitutional Judges, Rehan Abeyratne and
Iddo Porat lead an exploration of a new topic in comparative constitutional law: towering …

In the common law tradition, it has long been the case that a contract not backed by
consideration is no contract at all. But this rule has been slowly washed away in various …

While Atiyah's and Summers' concepts of form and substance in the context of constitutional
law are often associated with constitutional interpretation, they can also be fruitfully applied …

This article examines judicial engagement with the idea of separation of powers in
Singapore. It identifies and analyses three judicial doctrines that are explicitly justified by the …

Much ink has been spilt over the workings of irrationality review and its continuing
relevance. Absent in large part, however, is an examination of these issues situated outside …

Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor is potentially the most important constitutional
decision ever rendered by the Singapore Court of Appeal, insofar as it heralds a new and …

Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor is potentially the most important constitutional
decision ever rendered by the Singapore Court of Appeal, insofar as it heralds a new and …

Abstract Wham Kwok Han Jolovan v Public Prosecutor is potentially the most important
constitutional decision ever rendered by the Singapore Court of Appeal, insofar as it heralds …

JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE PRESIDENTIAL POWER Page 1 JUDICIAL REVIEW OF THE
PRESIDENTIAL POWER BENJAMIN LOW JUNJIE FACULTY OF LAW, NATIONAL …