Argumentative explanations for interactive recommendations
A significant challenge for recommender systems (RSs), and in fact for AI systems in
general, is the systematic definition of explanations for outputs in such a way that both the …
general, is the systematic definition of explanations for outputs in such a way that both the …
[HTML][HTML] From fine-grained properties to broad principles for gradual argumentation: A principled spectrum
The study of properties of gradual evaluation methods in argumentation has received
increasing attention in recent years, with studies devoted to various classes of …
increasing attention in recent years, with studies devoted to various classes of …
Evaluation of argument strength in attack graphs: Foundations and semantics
An argumentation framework is a pair made of a graph and a semantics. The nodes and the
edges of the graph represent respectively arguments and relations (eg, attacks, supports) …
edges of the graph represent respectively arguments and relations (eg, attacks, supports) …
How many properties do we need for gradual argumentation?
The study of properties of gradual evaluation methods in argumentation has received
increasing attention in recent years, with studies devoted to various classes of …
increasing attention in recent years, with studies devoted to various classes of …
Argumentation as a framework for interactive explanations for recommendations
As AI systems become ever more intertwined in our personal lives, the way in which they
explain themselves to and interact with humans is an increasingly critical research area. The …
explain themselves to and interact with humans is an increasingly critical research area. The …
The principle-based approach to abstract argumentation semantics
L van der Torre, S Vesic - IfCoLog Journal of Logics and Their …, 2017 - orbilu.uni.lu
The principle-based or axiomatic approach is a methodology to choose an argumentation
semantics for a particular application, and to guide the search for new argumentation …
semantics for a particular application, and to guide the search for new argumentation …
[HTML][HTML] Evaluation of arguments in weighted bipolar graphs
L Amgoud, J Ben-Naim - International Journal of Approximate Reasoning, 2018 - Elsevier
The paper tackled the issue of arguments evaluation in weighted bipolar argumentation
graphs (ie, graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and …
graphs (ie, graphs whose arguments have basic strengths, and may be both supported and …
[HTML][HTML] An empirical evaluation of the inferential capacity of defeasible argumentation, non-monotonic fuzzy reasoning and expert systems
Several non-monotonic formalisms exist in the field of Artificial Intelligence for reasoning
under uncertainty. Many of these are deductive and knowledge-driven, and also employ …
under uncertainty. Many of these are deductive and knowledge-driven, and also employ …
Preference in abstract argumentation
S Kaci, L van Der Torre, S Villata - Computational Models of …, 2018 - ebooks.iospress.nl
Consider an argument A that is attacked by an argument B, while A is preferred to B. Existing
approaches will either ignore the attack or reverse it. In this paper we introduce a new …
approaches will either ignore the attack or reverse it. In this paper we introduce a new …
SpArX: Sparse argumentative explanations for neural networks
Neural networks (NNs) have various applications in AI, but explaining their decisions
remains challenging. Existing approaches often focus on explaining how changing …
remains challenging. Existing approaches often focus on explaining how changing …