Abstract Background and Objectives To investigate whether and when the correction is done
in Systematic Reviews (SRs) and Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) when included …

Background This systematic review aimed to investigate the relationship between retraction
status and the methodology quality in the retracted non-Cochrane systematic review …

Academic publishing is undergoing a highly transformative process, and many established
rules and value systems that are in place, such as traditional peer review (TPR) and …

The extent to which a retraction might require revising previous scientific estimates and
beliefs–which we define as the epistemic cost–is unknown. We collected a sample of 229 …

Background Retraction is a mechanism for alerting readers to unreliable material and other
problems in the published scientific and scholarly record. Retracted publications generally …

Social media and new tools for engagement offer democratic platforms for enhancing
constructive scientific criticism which had previously been limited. Constructive criticism can …

Background Retractions are a key proxy for recognizing errors in research and publication
and for reconciling misconduct in the scientific literature. The underlying factors associated …

PREDIMED trial of Mediterranean diet: retracted, republished, still trusted? Page 1 PREDIMED
trial of Mediterranean diet: retracted, republished, still trusted? Arnav Agarwal and John PA …

Previous research has found authors of retracted publications responsible for the vast
majority of retractions. Although considerable research attention has been given to reasons …

Epistemic trust among scientists is inevitable. There are two questions about this:(1) What is
the content of this trust, what do scientists trust each other for?(2) Is such trust epistemically …