Palgrave Innovations in Philosophy is a new series of monographs. Each book in the series
will constitute the 'new wave'of philosophy, both in terms of its topic and the research profile …

I argue that Alvin Goldman has failed to save process reliabilism from my critique in earlier
work of consequentialist or teleological epistemic theories. First, Goldman misconstrues the …

You think to yourself,“I shouldn't drink another Dr. Pepper. I've had two already”. But the
claim that you shouldn't drink another seems like a very different kind of claim than the claim …

This paper argues that reliabilism can plausibly live without epistemic consequentialism,
either as part of a non‐consequentialist normative theory or as a non‐normative account of …

Epistemologists disagree over their relationship. Reliabilists believe the second helps
explain the first. And by “explain” the reliabilist sets out to really, genuinely explain, to “state …

There are different kinds of normative reason for action, including moral reasons and
reasons of self-interest. There are also different kinds of normative requirement, including …

Proper functionalism explicates epistemic warrant in terms of the function and normal
functioning of the belief-forming process. There are two standard substantive views of the …

Here I will re-purpose Nozick's (1974)“Experience Machine” thought experiment against
hedonism into an argument against Veritic Epistemic Consequentialism. According to VEC …

Com o presente estudo pretende-se responder ao seguinte problema filosófico central:(i)
será que a crença em Deus pode ter algum grau de garantia ou de estatuto epistémico …

In this chapter we shall do two things. First, we summarize the main claims of the book, and
then we briefly sketch a few directions in which philosophical discussion of curiosity might …