Patient motion impacts single photon emission computed tomography (SPECT), positron
emission tomography (PET) and x-ray computed tomography (CT) by giving rise to …

Subject motion in positron emission tomography (PET) is a key factor that degrades image
resolution and quality, limiting its potential capabilities. Correcting for it is complicated due to …

Long acquisition times due to intrinsically low signal‐to‐noise ratio and the need for highly
homogeneous B0 field make MRS particularly susceptible to motion or scanner instability …

Purpose To compare prospective motion correction (PMC) and retrospective motion
correction (RMC) in Cartesian 3D‐encoded MPRAGE scans and to investigate the effects of …

Head motion during MR acquisition reduces image quality and has been shown to bias
neuromorphometric analysis. The quantification of head motion, therefore, has both …

Purpose To demonstrate a novel method for tracking of head movements during MRI using
electroencephalography (EEG) hardware for recording signals induced by native imaging …

Purpose To enable motion‐robust diffusion weighted imaging of the brain using well‐
established imaging techniques. Methods An optical markerless tracking system was used …

We propose a deep learning-based data-driven respiratory phase-matched gated-PET
attenuation correction (AC) method that does not need a gated-CT. The proposed method is …

Purpose Prospective motion correction is arguably the “silver bullet” solution for magnetic
resonance imaging (MRI) studies impacted by motion, applicable to almost any pulse …

Objective Head motions during brain PET scan cause degradation of brain images, but head
fixation or external-maker attachment become burdensome on patients. Therefore, we have …