Human reasoning is often conceived as an interplay between a more intuitive and deliberate
thought process. In the last 50 years, influential fast-and-slow dual-process models that …

Greene's influential dual-process model of moral cognition (mDPM) proposes that when
people engage in Type 2 processing, they tend to make consequentialist moral judgments …

Previous research has highlighted the importance of physicians' early hypotheses for their
subsequent diagnostic decisions. It has also been shown that diagnostic accuracy improves …

Metacognition refers to the human capacity to access and monitor one's own mental states.
Recent research suggests that this capacity expands to the social world, eg, when …

People often protect themselves from information that might make their judgments and
decisions look questionable; information that they could easily access, but that they choose …

Although the susceptibility to reasoning biases is often assumed to be a stable trait, the
temporal stability of people's performance on popular heuristics-and-biases tasks has been …

The current study evaluates whether college students can identify characteristics of autism
as diagnostic for autism, and characteristics of other disabilities as not diagnostic for autism …

We assessed the perceived authenticity of attitudes expressed toward several social groups
as a function of whether those attitudes were expressed by the self or by other people, and …

Moral intuitions are generally understood as automatic strong responses to moral facts. In
this paper, I offer a metacognitive account according to which the strength of moral intuitions …

Dual-process theories of the mind emphasize how reasoning is an interplay between
intuitive and reflective thinking. This paper aims to understand how the two types of …