The way science is assessed, published, and disseminated has markedly changed since
1986, when the launch of a new Congress focused on the science of peer review was first …

The way science is assessed, published, and disseminated has markedly changed since
1986, when the launch of a new congress focused on the science of peer review was first …

The increasing significance of interdisciplinary research poses a challenge in evaluating its
quality and emphasizes the need for academic journals to choose appropriate reviewers for …

The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative
AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process. This …

Objective The objective of this study was to examine representation of women on the
editorial boards of cardiothoracic surgery-focused journals over the past 2 decades to …

The labyrinthine process of manuscript evaluation in scientific publishing often delays
disseminating timely research results. Generative Artificial Intelligence (genAI) models could …

Most articles in The BMJ aren't written by staff. Many are commissioned, and the rest are
selected from submissions we receive through a process of open peer review and …

Objectives To assess whether the gender (primary) and geographical affiliation (post-hoc) of
the first and/or last authors are associated with publication decisions after peer review …

I am a female researcher from China. I began medical research in 2007, when I was 27
years old. For the first 10 years or so I did not even consider reviewing medical manuscripts …

The exponential increase in the number of submissions, further accelerated by generative
AI, and the decline in the availability of experts are burdening the peer review process. This …