Background Intraoral scanners (IOS) are devices for capturing direct optical impressions in
dentistry. The purpose of this narrative review on the use of IOS was to:(1) identify the …

Statement of problem Limited evidence is available for the marginal and internal fit of fixed
dental restorations fabricated with digital impressions compared with those fabricated with …

Aim This systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted to assess and compare the
accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions. The review was registered on the …

Purpose To test whether or not digital full‐arch implant impressions with two different intra‐
oral scanners (CEREC Omnicam and True Definition) have the same accuracy as …

Purpose To systematically review in vitro and clinical studies comparing quantitatively the
3D accuracy (global implant deviations) of digital vs conventional implant impressions for …

Statement of problem Intraoral scan body (ISB) design is highly variable and its role in the
digital workflow and accuracy of digital scans is not well understood. Purpose The purpose …

Background The purpose of this narrative review was to examine the applicability of IOS
procedures regarding single and multiple fixed implant restorations. Clinical outcomes for …

Aim: The use of intraoral scanners (IOS) for making digital implant impressions is increasing.
However, there is a lack of evidence on the accuracy of IOS compared with conventional …

Purpose. The aim of this in vitro study was to compare the accuracy of different implant
impression techniques of the maxillary full arch with tilted implants of two connection types …

Statement of problem To the authors' knowledge, while accuracy outcomes of the TRIOS
scanner have been compared with conventional impressions, no available data are …