Introduction Inter‐observer variability (IOV) in target volume and organ‐at‐risk (OAR)
delineation is a source of potential error in radiation therapy treatment. The aims of this study …

Purpose Peer review is a recommended component of quality assurance in radiation
oncology; however, it is resource-intensive and its effect on patient care is not well …

Introduction: Although the value of peer review is increasingly recognized, there is little
research documenting its impact in the setting of stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) …

The international radiotherapy community has recognised that non-adherence to RT
protocols can influence trial endpoints. However this conclusion is based on studies …

Aims Dose–response curves suggest that higher doses of radiotherapy improve the
complete response rate in rectal cancer. The UK adopted the EXPERT trial dose and …

The implementation and early adoption of online adaptive radiotherapy (oART) has required
the presence of clinicians, physicists and radiation therapists (RTT) at the treatment console …

Purpose Physician peer review seeks to improve the quality of care through the evaluation
of physician performance, specifically medical decision making and technical expertise. To …

PURPOSE To evaluate and report the frequency of changes in radiation therapy treatment
plans after peer review in a simulation review meeting once a week. MATERIALS AND …

Technological advances in radiation therapy permit steep dose gradients from the target to
spare normal tissue, but increase the risk of geographic miss. Suboptimal target delineation …

Purpose Peer review (PR) of treatment plans has been recognized internationally as a key
component of quality care in radiation oncology programs (ROPs). We conducted a survey …