Background Intraoral scanners (IOS) are devices for capturing direct optical impressions in
dentistry. The purpose of this narrative review on the use of IOS was to:(1) identify the …

Aim This systematic review and meta‐analysis were conducted to assess and compare the
accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions. The review was registered on the …

Objectives This network meta-analysis (NMA) aimed to compare the complete-arch
scanning accuracy of different intraoral scanners (IOSs) to that of reference standard …

Purpose To systematically review in vitro and clinical studies comparing quantitatively the
3D accuracy (global implant deviations) of digital vs conventional implant impressions for …

Statement of problem Intraoral scan body (ISB) design is highly variable and its role in the
digital workflow and accuracy of digital scans is not well understood. Purpose The purpose …

Statement of problem Scanning of completely edentulous arches remains a challenge
because of the large surface to scan and the lack of anatomic indexes. Whether the …

Background The purpose of this narrative review was to examine the applicability of IOS
procedures regarding single and multiple fixed implant restorations. Clinical outcomes for …

Statement of problem The effect of various scan bodies and scanning techniques on the
accuracy and scan time for completely edentulous patients is not well understood. Purpose …

Objectives Comparison of full-arch digital impressions to conventional impressions in vitro
and in vivo. Materials and methods A straight metal bar was fixed between the second upper …

Background: The objective of this study was to compare conventional versus digital
impressions for Full-Arch maxillary rehabilitations. Methods: Patients selected for this study …